Confused by all the ways to personalize LLMs? We break down fine-tuning, prompt engineering, and instruction tuning—so you know what, when, why?
Co-founder & Head of AI; ex-Balyasny Asset Mgmt CTO for credit technology.
As large language models (LLMs) mature, customizing them has gone from "nice to have" to business-critical. But with so many options—prompt engineering, instruction tuning, fine-tuning, LoRA, QLoRA, adapters—the decision tree can quickly become overwhelming.
Let’s demystify the landscape.
MethodDefinitionPrompt EngineeringDesigning precise, structured inputs to steer LLM output behaviorInstruction TuningTraining models on a variety of instructions to generalize across tasksFine-TuningRe-training parts (or all) of the base model on custom labeled dataLoRA / QLoRALightweight fine-tuning via low-rank adapters—cheap and memory-efficient
FactorPromptingInstruction TuningFull Fine-TuningLoRA / QLoRACostNoneHighVery HighLowLatencyLowMediumMediumLowData NeededNone1K–10K examples50K+1K–5KCustom BehaviorShallowGeneralizedDeepTargetedDev ExperienceEasiestHarderComplexModerate
“Don’t reach for a hammer when a prompt will do the job.”
— NovaLuna Labs, Applied AI Team
There’s no one-size-fits-all. Your LLM customization method should align with:
At NovaLuna, we often recommend:
Make your customization strategy deliberate—not expensive.
Get the latest insights on Generative AI, automation breakthroughs, and enterprise-ready LLM tools—delivered straight to your inbox.